High School

Thank you for visiting Twenty nine states and the District of Columbia currently have laws broadly legalizing marijuana in some form Nine states and the District of Columbia have. This page is designed to guide you through key points and clear explanations related to the topic at hand. We aim to make your learning experience smooth, insightful, and informative. Dive in and discover the answers you're looking for!

Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia currently have laws broadly legalizing marijuana in some form. Nine states and the District of Columbia have adopted the most expansive laws legalizing marijuana for recreational use. Recently, California, Massachusetts, Maine, and Nevada legalized recreational marijuana. California's Proposition 64 allows adults twenty-one and older to possess up to one ounce of marijuana and grow up to six plants in their homes. Other tax and licensing provisions of the law will not take effect until January 2018.

After reading the passage, respond to parts A, B, and C.

A. Describe an action Congress could take in an effort to prevent the implementation of the laws described in the scenario.

B. In the context of the scenario, explain how federalism could affect the action you described in part A.

C. Explain why the federal government might choose not to enforce a federal law that conflicts with a state law.

Answer :

Final answer:

Congress could pass federal legislation to prevent the implementation of state marijuana laws. Federalism could impact this action due to states' rights. The federal government might choose not to enforce conflicting federal laws for various reasons.

Explanation:

A. Congress could take action to prevent the implementation of the state laws by passing federal legislation that prohibits the use and possession of marijuana, overriding the state laws. They could also choose to withhold federal funding or take legal action against states that have legalized marijuana.

B. In the context of the scenario, federalism could affect the action described in part A because marijuana laws are currently a matter of state jurisdiction. This means that Congress would need to pass a federal law that specifically addresses marijuana, which may face challenges due to the principle of federalism and the states' rights to regulate certain matters.

C. The federal government might choose not to enforce a federal law that conflicts with a state law due to a variety of reasons. One reason could be limited resources, as it may be impractical for the federal government to enforce its laws in every state. Additionally, the federal government might prioritize other issues and not see marijuana enforcement as a top priority.

Learn more about Congress's role in preventing marijuana laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/1253938

#SPJ11

Thank you for reading the article Twenty nine states and the District of Columbia currently have laws broadly legalizing marijuana in some form Nine states and the District of Columbia have. We hope the information provided is useful and helps you understand this topic better. Feel free to explore more helpful content on our website!

Rewritten by : Jeany

Other Questions