Thank you for visiting You wish to test the following claim tex H a tex at a significance level of tex alpha 0 01 tex begin align H 0. This page is designed to guide you through key points and clear explanations related to the topic at hand. We aim to make your learning experience smooth, insightful, and informative. Dive in and discover the answers you're looking for!
Answer :
We begin by noting that we wish to test
[tex]$$
\begin{aligned}
H_0&:\mu_1 = \mu_2, \\
H_a&:\mu_1 < \mu_2,
\end{aligned}
$$[/tex]
with a significance level of [tex]$\alpha=0.01$[/tex]. Two independent samples of data were collected. Their sizes, means, and variances (calculated with [tex]$n-1$[/tex] degrees of freedom for the sample variance) are as follows:
- For Sample \#1 with [tex]$n_1=56$[/tex], the sample mean is [tex]$\bar{x}_1 \approx 77.1768$[/tex] and the sample variance is [tex]$s_1^2 \approx 144.9905$[/tex].
- For Sample \#2 with [tex]$n_2=57$[/tex], the sample mean is [tex]$\bar{x}_2 \approx 77.7333$[/tex] and the sample variance is [tex]$s_2^2 \approx 189.4001$[/tex].
Because the sample variances differ, we use the two-sample [tex]$t$[/tex]-test for unequal variances (Welch’s [tex]$t$[/tex]-test). The test statistic is calculated using
[tex]$$
t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}.
$$[/tex]
Substituting the numbers into the formula gives
[tex]$$
t \approx \frac{77.1768 - 77.7333}{\sqrt{\frac{144.9905}{56} + \frac{189.4001}{57}}} \approx -0.2289.
$$[/tex]
Rounded to three decimal places, this yields
[tex]$$
t \approx -0.229.
$$[/tex]
Next, we determine the degrees of freedom (using the Welch–Satterthwaite approximation)
[tex]$$
df = \frac{\left(\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1}\right)^2}{n_1-1} + \frac{\left(\dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{n_2-1}}.
$$[/tex]
The computed value is approximately [tex]$df \approx 109.5487$[/tex]. (For our one-tailed test, the exact degrees of freedom used in the technology are taken into account.)
Because the alternative hypothesis is [tex]$H_a: \mu_1 < \mu_2$[/tex], we need the one-tailed [tex]$p$[/tex]-value corresponding to the test statistic. For a negative [tex]$t$[/tex] statistic, the one-tailed [tex]$p$[/tex]-value is given by the cumulative distribution function value
[tex]$$
p\text{-value} = P(T \le t),
$$[/tex]
where [tex]$T$[/tex] follows a [tex]$t$[/tex]-distribution with approximately [tex]$109.5487$[/tex] degrees of freedom. For [tex]$t \approx -0.2289$[/tex], the one-tailed [tex]$p$[/tex]-value computed comes out to
[tex]$$
p\text{-value} \approx 0.4097.
$$[/tex]
Thus, our final answers are:
[tex]$$
\text{Test statistic} = -0.229 \quad \text{(to three decimal places)},
$$[/tex]
[tex]$$
\text{p-value} = 0.4097 \quad \text{(to four decimal places)}.
$$[/tex]
Since the [tex]$p$[/tex]-value is much larger than the significance level [tex]$\alpha=0.01$[/tex], we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
[tex]$$
\begin{aligned}
H_0&:\mu_1 = \mu_2, \\
H_a&:\mu_1 < \mu_2,
\end{aligned}
$$[/tex]
with a significance level of [tex]$\alpha=0.01$[/tex]. Two independent samples of data were collected. Their sizes, means, and variances (calculated with [tex]$n-1$[/tex] degrees of freedom for the sample variance) are as follows:
- For Sample \#1 with [tex]$n_1=56$[/tex], the sample mean is [tex]$\bar{x}_1 \approx 77.1768$[/tex] and the sample variance is [tex]$s_1^2 \approx 144.9905$[/tex].
- For Sample \#2 with [tex]$n_2=57$[/tex], the sample mean is [tex]$\bar{x}_2 \approx 77.7333$[/tex] and the sample variance is [tex]$s_2^2 \approx 189.4001$[/tex].
Because the sample variances differ, we use the two-sample [tex]$t$[/tex]-test for unequal variances (Welch’s [tex]$t$[/tex]-test). The test statistic is calculated using
[tex]$$
t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}.
$$[/tex]
Substituting the numbers into the formula gives
[tex]$$
t \approx \frac{77.1768 - 77.7333}{\sqrt{\frac{144.9905}{56} + \frac{189.4001}{57}}} \approx -0.2289.
$$[/tex]
Rounded to three decimal places, this yields
[tex]$$
t \approx -0.229.
$$[/tex]
Next, we determine the degrees of freedom (using the Welch–Satterthwaite approximation)
[tex]$$
df = \frac{\left(\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1}\right)^2}{n_1-1} + \frac{\left(\dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{n_2-1}}.
$$[/tex]
The computed value is approximately [tex]$df \approx 109.5487$[/tex]. (For our one-tailed test, the exact degrees of freedom used in the technology are taken into account.)
Because the alternative hypothesis is [tex]$H_a: \mu_1 < \mu_2$[/tex], we need the one-tailed [tex]$p$[/tex]-value corresponding to the test statistic. For a negative [tex]$t$[/tex] statistic, the one-tailed [tex]$p$[/tex]-value is given by the cumulative distribution function value
[tex]$$
p\text{-value} = P(T \le t),
$$[/tex]
where [tex]$T$[/tex] follows a [tex]$t$[/tex]-distribution with approximately [tex]$109.5487$[/tex] degrees of freedom. For [tex]$t \approx -0.2289$[/tex], the one-tailed [tex]$p$[/tex]-value computed comes out to
[tex]$$
p\text{-value} \approx 0.4097.
$$[/tex]
Thus, our final answers are:
[tex]$$
\text{Test statistic} = -0.229 \quad \text{(to three decimal places)},
$$[/tex]
[tex]$$
\text{p-value} = 0.4097 \quad \text{(to four decimal places)}.
$$[/tex]
Since the [tex]$p$[/tex]-value is much larger than the significance level [tex]$\alpha=0.01$[/tex], we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Thank you for reading the article You wish to test the following claim tex H a tex at a significance level of tex alpha 0 01 tex begin align H 0. We hope the information provided is useful and helps you understand this topic better. Feel free to explore more helpful content on our website!
- You are operating a recreational vessel less than 39 4 feet long on federally controlled waters Which of the following is a legal sound device
- Which step should a food worker complete to prevent cross contact when preparing and serving an allergen free meal A Clean and sanitize all surfaces
- For one month Siera calculated her hometown s average high temperature in degrees Fahrenheit She wants to convert that temperature from degrees Fahrenheit to degrees
Rewritten by : Jeany