Thank you for visiting Wyatt is arrested under a federal statute that makes using marijuana illegal The state that Wyatt lives in allows recreational use of marijuana Wyatt challenges. This page is designed to guide you through key points and clear explanations related to the topic at hand. We aim to make your learning experience smooth, insightful, and informative. Dive in and discover the answers you're looking for!
Answer :
Judge Sanderson believes judges should defer to existing laws because there is no law higher than the laws created by a national government.
What guides the law supremacy?
In the constitution, the law supremacy is guided by supremacy clause which places the Federal law over other subordinate laws such as states law etc.
Deptie that Wyatt’s argument is that recreational marijuana use is now legal in eleven state, Sanderson believes judges should defer to existing laws because there is no law higher than the laws created by a national government.
Read more about law supremacy
brainly.com/question/1481445
#SPJ6
Thank you for reading the article Wyatt is arrested under a federal statute that makes using marijuana illegal The state that Wyatt lives in allows recreational use of marijuana Wyatt challenges. We hope the information provided is useful and helps you understand this topic better. Feel free to explore more helpful content on our website!
- You are operating a recreational vessel less than 39 4 feet long on federally controlled waters Which of the following is a legal sound device
- Which step should a food worker complete to prevent cross contact when preparing and serving an allergen free meal A Clean and sanitize all surfaces
- For one month Siera calculated her hometown s average high temperature in degrees Fahrenheit She wants to convert that temperature from degrees Fahrenheit to degrees
Rewritten by : Jeany
Final answer:
Judge Sanderson, who is a proponent of legal positivism, believes that the federal statute prohibiting marijuana use should not be overturned.
Explanation:
Judge Sanderson, a proponent of legal positivism, believes that the federal statute prohibiting marijuana use should not be overturned. Legal positivism is a school of legal thought that focuses on the literal interpretation and enforcement of the law, regardless of whether it aligns with personal beliefs or societal changes.
Judge Sanderson's ruling indicates that he does not believe Wyatt's argument about the need for modernization is a valid justification for overturning the federal law.
Judge Sanderson, being a proponent of the legal positivism school of legal thought, likely believes that the legality of marijuana is determined solely by the existing legal rules and statutes. Legal positivism is a school of thought that emphasizes the importance of written laws and regulations as the ultimate source of authority in the legal system.
